What is the difference between PCO 1810 and PCO 1881?

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Hopewell.

When it comes to the world of plastic bottle closures, there are numerous industry standards and specifications in place. Among them, PCO 1810 and PCO 1881 stand out as two widely used neck finishes. Each offers distinct features and benefits, making them unique in their own right. In this blog post, we will delve into the differences between PCO 1810 and PCO 1881, exploring their characteristics, applications, and advantages. So, let's embark on a journey of discovery and gain a deeper understanding of these widely adopted standards.

PCO 1810: The Time-Tested Classic.

PCO 1810 is an abbreviation for Plastic Closure Only, which stands for a standard neck finish predominantly used in the beverage industry. With its 18mm diameter opening and 10 thread starts, PCO 1810 has long been the go-to specification for carbonated beverages, including sodas, soft drinks, and sparkling water.

This neck finish standard is valued for its compatibility with high-speed production lines, enabling swift and efficient bottling processes. Bottlers favor PCO 1810 for its sturdy design, offering excellent burst strength and leak resistance. Its industry-wide acceptance and reliability have made it a preferred choice for beverage manufacturers for decades.

PCO 1881: Innovating for the Future.

As consumer demands evolve and sustainability takes center stage, the packaging industry constantly looks for ways to innovate. PCO 1881 emerged as a result of this quest for improvement. Boasting a neck finish with an 18mm diameter, 8 threads, and a shorter height compared to PCO 1810, this standard strongly appeals to both manufacturers and end consumers.

A key benefit of PCO 1881 lies in its material efficiency. With shorter closure height, bottle necks can be made smaller, resulting in lighter, eco-friendly bottles that reduce carbon footprint and transportation costs. Additionally, the design accommodates the use of tamper-evident band shrink sleeves, ensuring product safety and integrity. PCO 1881 neck finish is commonly found on water bottles, sports drinks, juices, and non-carbonated beverages.

Differences and Applications:

1. Design and Functionality:

PCO 1810: Known for its robust structure and wider threads, PCO 1810 is primarily used for carbonated beverages due to its excellent sealing properties and resistance to pressure build-up.

PCO 1881: Designed with sustainability in mind, PCO 1881 offers material savings, contributing to reduced waste and environmental impact. Its narrower, more compact threads make it well-suited for non-carbonated drink applications.

2. Bottle Weight Reduction:

PCO 1810: Due to its thicker design and larger threads, bottles with PCO 1810 closures tend to be slightly heavier, ensuring greater protection for carbonated drinks.

PCO 1881: With a focus on sustainability and cost-efficiency, bottles using PCO 1881 closures are lighter, enabling savings in material consumption and reducing transportation costs.

3. Compatibility:

PCO 1810: Established as a tried-and-true industry standard, PCO 1810 is compatible with existing supply chains, bottling equipment, and closure suppliers, making it easily accessible and cost-effective.

PCO 1881: As a newer alternative, PCO 1881 requires some adjustments to bottling machinery, capping systems, and closure suppliers. However, its potential for reduced environmental impact is an incentive for many manufacturers to adopt this standard.

Conclusion:

While PCO 1810 and PCO 1881 share similarities in terms of neck diameter, they offer distinct features and advantages that cater to different industry requirements. PCO 1810 has a long-standing legacy as the go-to standard for carbonated beverages, excelling in strength and compatibility. On the other hand, PCO 1881 represents a sustainable and eco-friendly alternative that promotes a lighter packaging footprint while maintaining product integrity for non-carbonated drinks.

Ultimately, the choice between PCO 1810 and PCO 1881 hinges on factors such as beverage type, production efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and environmental considerations. As the packaging industry continues to evolve, these standards will play pivotal roles in meeting changing consumer expectations while striving for sustainability and innovation.

Check now

Are you interested in learning more about dispensing closure? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!